
German 
Recently I found the following anecdote in the literature. I will mention it here, since it describes the slogan of my homepage quite well:
The important bacteriologist and Nobel award owner Emil Adolph of Behring has got a new assistant, who should operate in its institute. He frightened the young man with the following words: " If you want to carry out somewhat useful here, then forget everything you learned so far. That is all nonsense. You even can throw most of the technical literature away. That is also mainly nonsense. If you however want to proceed fast, then continue nonsense  however not with me."

Notes:

Preface: The principal purpose of each physical theory is to describe the measurement results of experimental or observing physics in the best way possible. In the area of cosmology however the appropriate socalled standard theory cannot explain the following observation results:
Particularly the Hubble law is again derived in another way and the result is compared with the measurements (1st essay). Based on this new access to the Hubble law the numberred shift relation (2nd essay) and the angularred shift relation (3rd essay) are derived. Both relations likewise deviate from today's text book cosmology. In the last two essays some interesting supplements and further conclusions are given. I am convinced that the proposed theoretical derivations are more correct than those of the standard cosmology, since the derived equations correspond better to the observations of astrophysics. Now I would like to invite you to convince yourself of it. 
You can read the first article here:  About several problems of modern cosmology  I. About the interpretation of the Hubble diagram
For a quick overview see equation (18), compare equation (20) with (xxx) and have a look on fig. 3. Here you can find the evaluation of present data. Notes:
You can find additions to the first part here.
Note: You can download the first article as ZIP file (PDF document) here. 
You can read the second article here:  About several problems of modern cosmology  II. About the number of cosmic systems in the universe
For a quick overview compare equation (2) with (yyy) and see fig. 4. Here you can find the evaluation of present data. You can find additions to the second part here.
Note: You can download the second article as ZIP file (PDF document) here. 
You can read the third article here:  About several problems of modern cosmology  III. About the mean size of cosmic objects
For a quick overview compare equation (2) with (zzz) and see fig. 3.
Note: You can download the third article as ZIP file (PDF document) here. 
You can read the fourth article here:  About several problems of modern cosmology  IV. Additions
For a quick overview it should be enough to read the first paragraph! You can find additions to the fourth part here.
Note: 
You can read the fifth article here:  About several problems of modern cosmology  V. About the red shift in the spectrum of cosmic objects
For a quick overview see equation (19), read the short chapters 4 and 5 and have a look on fig. 1. Note: I think that the proposed theoretical approaches which are concerned with the reasons for the cosmological red shift speak for themselves. 
Epilogue: One of the original objectives of thinking about the cosmological questions treated in the presented essays was to finally banish the extremely speculative and probably scientifically unreasonable Big Bang (with all its curious consequences) from the physical theory of cosmology. Unfortunately I must confess that this project was not successful. The cosmology still does not get along without the concept of the general expansion of the universe. This is however bly restricted because of the finiteness of the speed of light. From my point of view there are interesting corrections on today's generally accepted concepts of the development of the universe over the time. In particular I again would like to point out that the already for decades proven limitation of all velocities to the velocity of light prevents that the universe was infinitely dense, small and hot in former times. Therefore, to avoid the Big Bang which is so popular in the literature, the consulting of a quantum theory of gravitation is not necessary. All natural scientists working in this area of the science should think about this more and more. It is a pleasure to continue to give my attention to this task. ..... You may read here why the big bang was never in existence. 
About my experiences with journals: The series of articles published here was not accepted for publication by well known astrophysical journals.  If you like to read the answers of the journals which I asked to publish my articles, then click here . 
Get in touch: If you have questions, suggestions, comments and other remarks please send me an email . 
Words of thanks: I like to thank the creators of the internet! Without the invention of the internet an easy and effective publication of the theoretical approach about cosmology which differs from the so called standard literature about cosmology would be not possible. 
Copyright: The here published text is under the control of the German and international copyright, i.e. publications, translations, transfers to other media etc.  also in parts  is only permitted with prior permission of the author. The rights of parts of some figures belong to the publishing houses of the references given. Copyright by Steffen Haase, Greifswald (1998) and Leipzig (1999) 
last update: 02/09/2004 last correction of spelling mistakes: 01/17/2007 